Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education. Sustainable urban systems: articulating a long-term convergence research agenda. Washington DC: National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education; 2018.
Google Scholar
Anand N. Pressure: the politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cult Anthropol. 2011;26:542–64.
Google Scholar
Anand N. Municipal disconnect: on abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography. 2012;13:487–509.
Google Scholar
Angel S, Parent J, Civco D. The fragmentation of urban landscapes: global evidence of a key attribute of the spatial structure of cities, 1990–2000. Envrion Urban. 2012;24:249–83.
Google Scholar
Bailey K. Constructing monothetic and polythetic typologies by the heuristic method. Sociol Q. 1973;14:291–308.
Google Scholar
Bestill M, Bulkeley H. Cities and the multilevel governance of climate change. Glob Gov. 2006;12:141–59.
Google Scholar
Bulkeley H. Urban sustainability: learning from best practice. Environ Plann A. 2006;38:1029–44.
Google Scholar
Bulkeley H, Bestill M. Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environ Politics. 2005;14:42–63.
Google Scholar
Bulkeley H, Marvin S, Voytenko Palgan Y, McCormick K, Breitfuss-Loidl M, Mai L, von Wirth T, Frantzeskaki N. Urban living laboratories: conducting the experimental city? Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2018;26:317–35.
Google Scholar
Camagni R, Gibelli C, Rigamonti P. Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecol Econom. 2002;40:199–216.
Google Scholar
Campanella TJ. Urban resilience and the recovery of New Orleans. J Am Plan Assoc. 2006;76:141–6.
Google Scholar
Caniglia G, Schapke N, Lang D, Abson D, Luederitz C, Wiek A, Laubichler M, Gralla F, von Wehrden H. Experiments and evidence in sustainability science: a typology. J Clean Prod. 2017;169:39–47.
Google Scholar
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley NM, Guston DH, Jager J, Mitchell RB. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8086–91.
CAS
Google Scholar
Chavez A, Ramaswami A. Articulating a trans-boundary infrastructure supply chain greenhouse gas emission footprint for cities: mathematical relationships and policy relevance. Energy Policy. 2013;54:376–84.
Google Scholar
Clarke N. Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Prog Hum Geogr. 2012;36:25–43.
Google Scholar
Coutard O, Rutherford J, editors. Beyond the networked city: infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in the north and south. London: Routledge; 2015.
Creutzig F. Towards typologies of urban climate and global environmental change. Environ Res Lett. 2015;10:101001.
Google Scholar
Creutzig F, Baiocchi G, Bierkandt R, Pichler P, Seto K. Global typology of urban energy use and potentials for an urbanization mitigation wedge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:6283–8.
CAS
Google Scholar
Crivello S. Urban policy mobilities: the case of Turin as a smart city. Eur Plan Stud. 2015;23:909–21.
Google Scholar
Currie P, Lay-Sleeper E, Fernandez JE, Kim J, Musango JK. Towards urban resource flow estimates in data scarce environments: the case of African cities. J Environ Protection. 2015;6:1066–86.
Google Scholar
Currie P, Musango J. African urbanization assimilating urban metabolism into sustainability discourse and practice. J Ind Ecol. 2016;21:1262–76.
Google Scholar
Davis D. Insecure and secure cities: towards a reclassification of world cities in a global era. MIT Int Rev. 2008;1:30–41.
Google Scholar
Dunn G, Brown R, Bos J, Bakker K. The role of science-policy interface in sustainable urban water transitions: lessons from Rotterdam. Environ Sci Pol. 2017;73:71–9.
Google Scholar
Evans J, Karvonen A. Give me a laboratory and I will lower your carbon footprint!’ — Urban Laboratories and the governance of low-carbon futures. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2014;38:413–30.
Google Scholar
Frantzeskaki N, Kabisch N. Designing a knowledge coproduction operating space for urban environmental governance—lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environ Sci Pol. 2016;62:90–8.
Google Scholar
Frantzeskaki N, Rok A. Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environ Innov Soc Tr. 2018;29:47–51.
Google Scholar
Gandy M. Rethinking urban metabolism: water space and the modern city. City. 2004;8:363–79.
Google Scholar
Graham S, Marvin S. Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge; 2001.
Google Scholar
Guy S, Marvin S, Moss T, editors. Urban infrastructure in transition: networks, buildings, plans. New York: Earthscan; 2001.
Google Scholar
Hall T, Hubbard T. The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies? Prog Hum Geogr. 1996;20:153–74.
Google Scholar
Harrison P. South–south relationships and the transfer of ‘best practice’: the case of Johannesburg, South Africa. Int Dev Plann Rev. 2015;37:205–23.
Google Scholar
Hillman T, Ramaswami A. Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities. Eviron Sci Technol. 2010;44:1902–10.
CAS
Google Scholar
ICLEI. U.S. community protocol for accounting and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions. Denver: ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability; 2012.
Google Scholar
International Resource Panel. The weight of cities: resource requirements of future urbanization. Nairobi: UN Environment; 2018.
Google Scholar
Jokinen A, Leino H, Backlund P, Laine M. Strategic planning harnessing urban policy mobilities: the gradual development of local sustainability fix. J Environ Pol Plann. 2018;20:551–63.
Google Scholar
Karvonen A, van Heur B. Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2014;38:379–92.
Google Scholar
Kloosterman R, Musterd S. The polycentric urban region: towards a research agenda. Urban Stud. 2001;38:623–33.
Google Scholar
Kunseler E, Tuinstra W, Vasileiadou E, Petersen AC. The reflective futures practitioner: balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders. Futures. 2015;66:1–12.
Google Scholar
Lam DPM, Martín-López B, Wiek A, Bennett EM, Frantzeskaki N, Horcea-Milcu AI, Lang DJ. Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transform. 2020;2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9.
Lang D, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffaacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas C. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci. 2012;7:25–43.
Google Scholar
Lathouri M. The city as a project: types, typical objects, and typologies. Arch Digest. 2011;209:24–31.
Google Scholar
Lee B. Edge or edgeless cities? Urban spatial structure in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000. J Reg Sci. 2007;47:479–515.
Google Scholar
Leichenko R. Climate change and urban resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sust. 2011;3:164–8.
Google Scholar
Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Change. 2005;15:57–68.
Google Scholar
Lohrey S, Creutzig F. A ‘sustainability window’ of urban form. Transp Res D. 2015;45:96–11.
Google Scholar
Luederitz C, Schapke N, Wiek A, Lang D, Bergmann M, Bos J, Burch S, Davies A, Evans J, Konig A, Farrelly M, Forrest N, Frantzeskaki N, Gibson R, Kay B, Loorbach D, McCormick K, Parodi O, Rauschmayer F, Schneidewind U, Stauffacher M, Stelzer F, Trencher G, Venjakob J, Vergragt P, von Wehrden H, Westley F. Learning through evaluation: a tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments. J Clean Prod. 2017;169:61–76.
Google Scholar
Magliocca N, Ellis E, Allington G, de Bremond A, Dell’Angelo J, Mertz O, Messerli P, Meyfroitdt P, Seppelt R, Verburg P. Closing global knowledge gaps: producing generalized knowledge from case studies of social-ecological systems. Global Environ Chang. 2018;50:1–14.
Google Scholar
Mahendra A, Seto KC. Upward and outward growth: managing urban expansion for more equitable cities in the global south. Washington DC: World Resources Institute; 2019.
Google Scholar
Mauser W, Gernot K, Rice M, Schmalzbauer B, Hackmann H, Leemans R, Moore H. Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2013;5:420–31.
Google Scholar
McCann E. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. An Am Assoc Geogr. 2011;101:107–30.
Google Scholar
McCann E, Ward K. Assembling urbanism: following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environ Plann A. 2012;44:42–51.
Google Scholar
McCormick K, Anderberg S, Coenen L, Neij L. Advancing sustainable urban transformation. J Clean Prod. 2013;50:1–11.
Google Scholar
McFarlane C. Sanitation in Mumbai’s informal settlements: state, ‘slum’, and infrastructure. Environ Plann A. 2008;40:88–107.
Google Scholar
McFarlane C, Rutherford J. Political infrastructures: governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2008;32:363–74.
Google Scholar
McFarlane C, Silver J, Truelove Y. Cities within cities: intra-urban comparison of infrastructure in Mumbai, Delhi and Cape Town. Urban Geogr. 2017;38:1393–417.
Google Scholar
McKinney J. The polar variables of type construction. Soc Forces. 1957;35:300–6.
Google Scholar
Meerow S, Newell J, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plann. 2016;147:38–49.
Google Scholar
Minnery J, Storey D, Setyono J. Lost in translation? Comparing planning responses to urban growth in the global north and south. Urban Geogr. 2012;33:850–65.
Google Scholar
Muggah R. Deconstructing the fragile city: exploring insecurity, violence and resilience. Eviron Urban. 2014;26:345–58.
Google Scholar
Muñoz-Erickson T. Coproduction of knowledge–action systems in urban sustainable governance: the KASA approach. Environ Sci Pol. 2014;37:182–91.
Google Scholar
Parnell S, Robinson J. (Re) theorizing cities from the Global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geogr. 2012;33:593–617.
Parnell S, Pieterse E. Translational global praxis: rethinking methods and modes of African urban research. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2015;40:236–46.
Google Scholar
Patel Z, Greyling S, Parnell S, Pirie G. Co-producing urban knowledge: experimenting with alternatives to ‘best practice’ for Cape Town, South Africa. Int Dev Plann Rev. 2015;37:187–203.
Google Scholar
Peck J, Theodore N. Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 2010;41:169–174.
Pierre J. Models of urban governance: the institutional dimensions of urban politics. Urban Aff Rev. 1999;34:372–96.
Google Scholar
Pierre J. Can urban regimes travel in time and space? Urban regime theory, urban governance theory, and comparative urban politics. Urban Aff Rev. 2014;50:864–89.
Google Scholar
Ramaswami A, Chavez A, Ewing-Thiel J, Reeve K. Two approaches to greenhouse gas emissions foot-printing at the city scale. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:4205–6.
CAS
Google Scholar
Ramaswami A, Hillman T, Janson B, Reiner M, Thomas G. A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:6455–61.
CAS
Google Scholar
Ramaswami A, Jiang D, Tong K, Zhao J. Impact of the economic structure of cities on urban scaling factors: implications for urban material and energy flows in China. J Ind Ecol. 2017;22:392–405.
Google Scholar
Ramaswami A, Russell A, Culligan P, Sharma K, Kumar E. Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities. Science. 2016;352:940–3.
CAS
Google Scholar
Roberts B. Managing systems of secondary cities: policy responses in international development. Brussels: Cities Alliance; 2015.
Google Scholar
Robinson J. Global and world cities: a view from off the map. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2002;26:531–54.
Google Scholar
Robinson J. Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. New York: Routledge; 2006.
Google Scholar
Roy A. Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. J Am Plan Assoc. 2005;71:147–58.
Google Scholar
Roy A. The 21st century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Reg Stud. 2009a;43:819–30.
Google Scholar
Roy A. Why India cannot plan its cities: informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Plann Theor. 2009b;8:76–87.
Google Scholar
Roy A, AlSayyad N, editors. Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia. Oxford: Lexington Books; 2004.
Google Scholar
Roy A, Ong A, editors. Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing; 2011.
Google Scholar
Sarkki S, Tinch R, Niemela J, Heink U, Waylen K, Timaeus J, Young J, Wattf A, Neßhover C, van den Hove S. Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: a novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces. Environ Sci Pol. 2015;54:505–12.
Google Scholar
Sassen S. The global city: introducing a concept. Brown J World Aff. 2005;11:27–43.
Google Scholar
Schneider A, Mertes C, Tatem A, Tan B, Sulla-Menashe D, Graves S, Patel N, Horton J, Gaughan A, Rollo J, Schelly I, Stevens F, Dastur A. A new urban landscape in east–Southeast Asia, 2000–2010. Environ Res Lett. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034002.
Schneider A, Woodcock C. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud. 2008;45:659–92.
Google Scholar
Simone AM. People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Pub Cul. 2004;16:407–29.
Google Scholar
Solecki W, Seto K, Balk D, Biggio A, Boone C, Creutzig F, Fragkias M, Lwasa S, Marcotullio P, Romero-Lankao P, Zwickel T. A conceptual framework for an urban areas typology to integrate climate change mitigation and adaptation. Urban Clim. 2015;14:116–37.
Google Scholar
Stoker G, Mossberger K. Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environ Plann C. 1994;12:195–212.
Google Scholar
Tengo M, Hill R, Malmer P, Raymond C, Spierenburg M, Danielsen F, Elmqvist T, Folke C. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2017;26(27):17–25.
Google Scholar
Thomson G, Newman P. Urban fabrics and urban metabolism – from sustainable to regenerative cities. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;132:218–29.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson R. Introduction ‘best practice’ in development planning: products, processes and networks. Int Dev Plann Rev. 2015;37:120–8.
Google Scholar
UN Environment. Sustainable urban infrastructure transitions in the ASEAN region: a resource perspective. Nairobi: UN Environment; 2018.
Google Scholar
van der Hel S. New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge coproduction in future earth. Environ Sci Pol. 2016;61:165–75.
Google Scholar
von Wirth T, Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L. Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies. 2018;27(2):229–57.
Google Scholar
Watson V. Seeing from the south: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Stud. 2009;46:2259–75.
Google Scholar
World Bank. East Asia’s changing urban landscape: measuring a decade of spatial growth. Washington DC: World Bank; 2015.
Google Scholar
Yazdani S, Dola K. Sustainable city priorities in global north versus global south. J Sustain Dev. 2013;6:38–47.
Google Scholar
Zborel T, Holland B, Thomas G, Baker L, Calhoun K, Ramaswami A. Translating research to policy for sustainable cities: what works and what doesn’t. J Ind Ecol. 2012;16:786–8.
Google Scholar