Table 6 Chart showing how knowledge of the project-partnership can inform management strategies and produce desirable outcomes across sites
CUP Site | Observation | Adaptive Management Strategy | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
Mexico City & UNAM | Government shift will disrupt partnership | Build relationships outside of current configuration | Partnership survived government upheaval |
Luneburg & Leuphana | Uncertainty around city priorities and feelings towards CUP | Conduct reflective interviews with stakeholders | Gamified workshops for partnership development created |
Portland & PSU | CUP is durable and attained outcomes enhanced trust and capacity | Formalize partnership with enhanced cross-institutional support and ambitious goals | Assembled new collaborative team of empowered leaders at city and university |
Karlsruhe & KIT | University desires and nomenclature are not meeting city needs | Talk about the work in ways that resonate with municipal work-flow | City more receptive to interventions |
Tempe & ASU | Partnership is not robust or resilient to change | Involve more participants on city and university side | City and university jointly planning future prolonged engagement |