Skip to main content

Table 3 Conclusions from Comparative Analysis with Kampala and other African Primary Cities

From: Similar, yet different! Comparing Ugandan secondary cities’ food system and nutritional transformations to findings from African primary cities

Mbale/Mbarara finding

Comparison summary

Diet diversity: Low-medium (but medium mainly added groups of less nutritional value such as sugar and oil). Strong maize and starchy staples focus

Similar

Food insecurity: Common feeling of being food insecure; Mean HFIASS Mbale: 7; Mbarara: 5; % HHs food insecure HFIAP Mbale: 67% Mbarara: 56%

Similar

NCD experience & surrounding discourse: prevalence of overweight, obesity, diabetes, hypertension similar to Kampala and other African cities, despite the high levels of food insecurity and low diet diversity. Discourses similar

Similar

Food Sources: Lack of advanced supermarketisation of resident food baskets

Similar in Kampala; May be different from other African cities

Food sources: Persistence of traditional markets, and small shops that give credit, and where a customer is also more able to negotiate on price, for majority of residents’ needs was apparent across diverse residents

Similar in Kampala; May be different from some other African cities

Food access strategies: The ways Mbale/Mbarara residents accessed food from different sources varied by class, assets, and links to rural land/relations

Some difference due to greater mobility & link to farming

Active in rural agriculture: Own agriculture (via own or hired labour or family labour in rural area) continues to be important for many Mbale and Mbarara residents, largely supplementing food basket but some sales

Different (need for more representative surveys, not those selecting only UA households)

Differing role of an urban agriculture: UA mainly yard gardening of maize/leafy vegetables for consuming, less market gardening; little evidence of zero-grazing/free-roaming livestock; nor of poultry/small meat-rearing

Different

Potential of institutions to improve food security, via facilitating access to land to farm for staff/ surrounding communities, or simply via subsidies/donations

Different in that smaller cities may have less land pressure, & institutions may retain greater land areas