Table 5 Steps and criteria for literature review
From: An assessment framework for safeguarding public values on mobility platforms
Theme | Search term | Articles identified | Articles excluded based on abstract analysis | Articles included in further analysis (full-text analysis) | Articles excluded based on full-text analysis | Article reference included in the final framework |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public value identified in the Rathenau Instituut Report: Urgent Upgrade Protect Public Values in Our Digitized Society (Social and ethical themes in Table 3.1) | Term used in the advanced search in Web of Science. | The number refers to the number of articles that have been identified through the advanced search. | The number refers to the number of identified articles that have been excluded after reading their abstract. | The number refers to the number of articles that were read in full (meaning those that were not excluded after reading the abstract). | The number refers to the number of identified articles that have been excluded after reading them in full. | The number refers to the number of identified articles that have been included as a reference in the final framework. In brackets we indicate the exact public value for which the reference was included. We want to emphasize that also articles that are not included in the final framework informed our discussions. |
| Â | Inclusion criteria | We employed the following criteria when assessing if an article should be further included in the research (first referring to reading the articles in full and second referring to including it in the final framework): - Articles must have been published after 1999. This criterion was already implemented in the search strategy. - Articles must have been published in English. This criterion was already implemented in the search strategy. - Included articles must explicitly concern an aspect related to Mobility as a Service (MaaS) or mobility platforms. - Included articles must concern public values (as defined in our paper). | ||||
Public values | TS = (Public values AND MaaS) | 11 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
Autonomy | TS = (Autonomy AND MaaS) | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Autonomy AND mobility platform) | 38 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
Privacy | TS = (Privacy AND MaaS) | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
TS = (Privacy AND mobility platform) | 44 | 37 | 7 | 5 | 2 (Privacy) | |
Accessibility | TS = (Accessibility AND MaaS) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 (Accessibility) |
TS = (Accessibility AND mobility platform) | 49 | 44 | 5 | 1 | 4 (Accessibility, Proximity richness) | |
Justice | TS = (Justice AND MaaS) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Justice AND mobility platform) | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 (Sustainable energy, Ownership) | |
Equality | TS = (Equality AND MaaS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Equality AND mobility platform) | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Equity | TS = (Equity AND MaaS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Equity AND mobility platform) | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 (Accessibility, Privacy, Affordability) | |
Balance of power | TS = (Balance of power AND MaaS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Balance of power AND mobility platform) | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Control over technology | TS = (Control over technology AND MaaS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Control over technology AND mobility platform) | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Human dignity | TS = (Human dignity AND MaaS) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TS = (Human dignity AND mobility platform) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |