Table 4 Data sources for comparative case study

Interviews

“A”, Fietsersbond, 13/01/2020; “B”, urban planner, City of Amsterdam, 17/01/2020; “C”, urban designer, City of Amsterdam, 22/01/2020; “D”, Vervoerregio Amsterdam, 29/11/2019

“E”, Head of Cycling Policy, Brussels Capital Region, 30/09/2020; “F”, Public Space Strategic Advisor, 02/10/2020.

29/09/2020, “G”, Head of Transport Planning, City of Birmingham; “H”, Principal Transport Policy Officer, City of Birmingham, 02/10/2020

Grey literature

Gemeente Amsterdam [City of Amsterdam] (2016, 2017a, b, 2019a, b, c); Metropoolregio Amsterdam [Greater Amsterdam metropolitan transport authority] (Nieuwstraten 2019).

Bruxelles Mobilité (2016a, b, 2017, 2020); Bruxelles Environnement (2019); Pro Velo (2017); Région de Bruxelles-Capital; Van Zeebroeck and Charles (2014)

Birmingham Cycle Revolution, “Our Journey” (January 2020)^a; Birmingham Parking: Supplementary Planning Document, Consultation Draft (2019)^b; Birmingham City Council (Birmingham City Council 2020a, b)

Academic Sources

(Hirschhorn et al. 2019; Buiter 2008)

(Henry et al. 2020; Hubert et al. 2017; May 2017)

(Gunn 2018; Hirschhorn et al. 2019)

Journalism

(Verkade 2019)

(De Muelenaere 2020)

(Reid 2020a, b)

Legislation and Design Guidance

CROW (2012, 2016); Wet ruimtelijke ordening (BWBR0020449), revised 2018 (1965)^c

Wegcode [Roads Act] of 1975.

Manual for Streets 1 and 2 (UK DfT 2007; CIHT 2010).